[24471] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: (ICANN) STATEMENT ON HACKING OF NETWORK SOLUTIONS' SERVERS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Shaw)
Sun Jul 4 00:14:28 1999
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:12:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
To: Dean Robb <pceasy@norfolk.infi.net>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,
David Alejandro Hernandez Alonso <dhernand@infosel.com.mx>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990703190130.01034100@norfolk.infi.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I personally trust ICANN and NSI as far as I can throw their collective
asses. NSI has shown repeatedly that they don't give a rat's behind one
way or the other about DNS registration system, as long as they continue
to hold power over it. ICANN are far too shady and back-room meeting
oriented to really have anyone's best interest but their own at heart.
So, who's the lesser of the two evils? Both make me shudder.
--
Joseph W. Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
Freelance Computer Security Consultant and Perl Programmer
Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am."
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Dean Robb wrote:
> As part, no doubt, of the current ICANN/NSI war, NSI says that the hack
> attack come from the ISP colocated with ICANN...
>
> "Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of ICANN?"
>
> Dean Robb
> Owner, PC-EASY
> (757) 495-EASY [3279]
> On-site computer repairs, upgrades and consultations
> Lead SimOps columnist/reviewer on http://WWW.TheGamers.Net
