[22911] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Howard)
Wed Feb 3 12:09:22 1999
From: Phil Howard <phil@whistler.intur.net>
To: dean@av8.com (Dean Anderson)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:46:08 -0600 (CST)
Cc: John.Fraizer@EnterZone.Net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19990202211741.00aa63d4@odie.av8.com> from "Dean Anderson" at Feb 2, 99 09:43:41 pm
Dean Anderson wrote:
> In this case, it says at the the end that service providers "shall not
> utilize service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or
> service quality control checks"
Dropping spam on the floor is a "service quality control check". If it
can be made mechanical (as opposed to hiring a staff of hundreds to read
each incoming message to determine if it is spam or not) then it would
fit under this description.
--
-- *-----------------------------* Phil Howard KA9WGN * --
-- | Inturnet, Inc. | Director of Internet Services | --
-- | Business Internet Solutions | eng at intur.net | --
-- *-----------------------------* phil at intur.net * --
