[22803] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Hannan)
Mon Jan 25 02:18:09 1999
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:02:46 -0800
From: Alan Hannan <alan@globalcenter.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m104fsm-0008G4C@rip.psg.com>; from Randy Bush on Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 10:52:24PM -0800
> > Modern equipment should be able to handle the quantity of secondary/alias
> > addresses needed to deal with number of /30s required to uniquely number
> > each bi-lat, no?
>
> do i want to find out if ciscos and junipers can handle a hundred+ secondary
> addresses? and do we want to maintain such configurations??
it is odd to see you ask questions about yourself.
it is well known that modern routers can easily maintain logical
interfaces in excess of 300.
this should not be an issue.
what you want to do is up to you, what one can do is of
interesting discussion on this mailing list.
-alan
