[22498] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex P. Rudnev)
Wed Jan 6 08:46:51 1999
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 16:33:03 +0300 (MSK)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex@Relcom.EU.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <AC3D459AB764D2119E3100104B29264C06D57D@stl1mail1.stl1.dbn.net>
> > Regards,
> > Tony Li
> > IS-IS WG co-chair
> >
>
>
> Does anyone have any theoretical numbers that would indicate which protocol
> has a faster convergence time in a given situation? Are there any true
> performance diffrences?
Anyway, if you are ISP, you should aware of vendor'c compatibility, iBGP
over IGP, and quality of protocol realisation, but you never have chance
to see protocol performance if you was not so crazy to advertise BGP
routing into IGP or vice versa.
Through the IS-IS and OSPF workgroup's membners opinion is of a great
interest - I hope they did theoretical comparation of this protocols.
>
> Dan Rabb
> Network Engineer
> digital broadcast network
> dan@dbn.net
>
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
