[22497] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Rabb)
Wed Jan 6 08:24:19 1999
From: Dan Rabb <danr@stl1mail1.stl1.dbn.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 07:05:26 -0600
> We should also point out that the IETF is now an OSI liason
> organization
> and can make contributions to the ISO process. Further, given the
> technical expertise of the folks working in the IETF, the
> effective death
> of CLNP, and the fact that a significant proportion of the
> systems running
> IS-IS are actually doing so to forward IP, any contributions
> made by the
> IETF will be taken very seriously by ISO.
>
> Regards,
> Tony Li
> IS-IS WG co-chair
>
Does anyone have any theoretical numbers that would indicate which protocol
has a faster convergence time in a given situation? Are there any true
performance diffrences?
Dan Rabb
Network Engineer
digital broadcast network
dan@dbn.net
