|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:56:11 PST In-Reply-To: Chris Williams's message on Nov 18, 22:37. To: Chris Williams <psion@geekspace.com>, "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu> [In the message entitled "Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users" on Nov 18, 22:37, Chris Williams writes:] > Company S(pam) has a web site, hosted on the servers of > web-presence-provider Company P(rovider). Company S uses the services of > Company X to send out massive loads of SPAM, with referencing the web > site and even e-mail addresses hosted by Company H. Now, if I'm hearing > what's being said on this list correctly, Company H is being expected to > pull the website they host for Company S (or else be blackholed), _even > though no illegal or spam-generating activity is being generated on > their network_. > Am I understanding this correctly?!? You are understanding this correct. Spam support services certainly falls under the charter of the RBL. See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/candidacy.html#ByAssociation -- Dave Rand dlr@bungi.com http://www.bungi.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |