[21676] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cache-as-cache-can
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jesper Skriver)
Wed Nov 18 12:28:05 1998
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 09:32:50 +0100
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>
To: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@nec.co.jp>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19981118075044Y.kondou@inn.do.mms.mt.nec.co.jp>; from Katsuhiro Kondou on Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 07:50:44AM +0900
On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 07:50:44AM +0900, Katsuhiro Kondou wrote:
> In article <m0zfoVs-0004N3C@maya.whs.verio.net>,
> jzeeff@verio.net (Jon Zeeff) wrote;
>
> } I agree. You probably don't want these boxes doing more than a simple
> } default route. For that, rip1 or static+HSRP are fine. Let routers route.
>
> There are three problem even if above case is in use.
> 1 Cache appliance receives icmp redirect, if the gateway is
> not suitable to go. And the disaster happens, when the
> redirected router is down.
When you enable HSRP on a interface, you implicit also disables icmp
redirects ...
> 2 We see the same packet twice, if the packet redirected.
> This may lead higher cpu usage for the router.
Yes, this is correct ... but is it supports OSPF, I'd like IS-IS as well
...
/Jesper
--
Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager
Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
