[19909] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D. Falk)
Wed Sep 30 20:27:39 1998
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 17:13:48 -0700
From: "J.D. Falk" <jd-inet-access@cp.net>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>
Cc: inet-access@earth.com, nanog@merit.edu, domain-policy@lists.internic.net,
com-priv@psi.com, publicaffairs@panet.us-state.gov
Reply-To: jdfalk@cp.net
Mail-Followup-To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>,
"Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>, inet-access@earth.com,
nanog@merit.edu, domain-policy@lists.internic.net, com-priv@psi.com,
publicaffairs@panet.us-state.gov
In-Reply-To: <199809302148.AA03726@world.std.com>; from Barry Shein on Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 05:48:21PM -0400
On 09/30/98, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
> I don't think whether or not a business is being operated for criminal
> purposes is generally defended by showing that some things they do are
> not entirely criminal.
>
> I think it's judged by showing that nothing they do is criminal.
But why is this "judgement" only taking place in inet-access?
If they're really criminals, get the law after 'em.
--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cp.net> Have you hugged your backups today?
Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues)
Critical Path, Inc.
------ Critical Path is hiring in all departments! ------
