[196050] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering at public exchange authentication
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Job Snijders)
Sat Sep 30 06:02:50 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0701MB2062F0A0A48926BB9CBAC474A87E0@SN1PR0701MB2062.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:06:16 -0700
To: craig washington <craigwashington01@hotmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Craig,
It may be simplest to use GTSM https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5082
Kind regards,
Job
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington
<craigwashington01@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at public exchange locations.
>
> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
>
> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
>
