[196060] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering at public exchange authentication
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Temkin)
Sat Sep 30 12:25:12 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJN-mO06cVN89+7ay2eJb8MMOtUu61Xi0DjgvC+xFb=5cJjeaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Temkin <dave@temk.in>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:25:08 -0700
To: BRAD RAYMO <brad.raymo@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Talks about GSRs and Sup720's, but still relevant today.
https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog39/presentations/Scholl.pdf
-Dave
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, BRAD RAYMO <brad.raymo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks
> require it, some prefer it but do not require it, and others do not want to
> use it at all.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington <
> craigwashington01@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP
> > at public exchange locations.
> >
> > Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta,
> > do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
> >
> > Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
> >
> >
>
