[196038] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering at public exchange authentication
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (BRAD RAYMO)
Sat Sep 30 05:02:50 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0701MB2062F0A0A48926BB9CBAC474A87E0@SN1PR0701MB2062.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: BRAD RAYMO <brad.raymo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:05:37 -0700
To: craig washington <craigwashington01@hotmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks
require it, some prefer it but do not require it, and others do not want to
use it at all.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington <
craigwashington01@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP
> at public exchange locations.
>
> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta,
> do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
>
> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
>
>
