[195961] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sat Sep 23 07:20:01 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Fredrik Sallinen <fredrik.sallinen@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAGLZPFc_BBQ6e-Y-JLun=fBMyOr-yA4fAm7k4yWfdERGRRqdA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Fredrik Sallinen wrote:
> Please correct me If I'm wrong, AFAIK 464XLAT works best with mobile
> networks and its not suitable for fixed broadband. right?
It's most widely deployed in mobile networks, yes. There is nothing that
says it couldn't work anywhere else.
However, in fixed networks with PPPoE the most commonly used model is dual
stack with RFC7084 style routers.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
