[195749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Sep 12 01:02:41 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <f9757c59-52f6-cb54-b416-e9bab1e74c51@nvcube.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:55:46 -0400
To: shopik@nvcube.net
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Thomas Bellman <bellman@nsc.liu.se>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists@nvcube.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 10/09/2017 14:25, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> However I don't think market would generally appreciate the
>> implications linklocal brings to traceroute, where least bad option
>> would be just to originate hop-limit exceeded from loop0, with no
>> visibility on actual interface.
>=20
> rfc5837 would help but it seems market universally ignore it for some =
reason unknown to me (lack of interest and IPv6 adoption?)
>=20
> We find LL is simpler, operation wise at some cases.
How=E2=80=99s that work out for you on routers with the same MAC address =
on multiple interfaces when you=E2=80=99re trying to troubleshoot ECMP =
trace routes?
Owen
