[195755] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Loopback/Point-to-Point address allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Tue Sep 12 03:53:02 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D5DC7DDE.85874%lee@asgard.org>
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:52:58 +0300
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 12 September 2017 at 01:08, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:
>>Are any of you currently running IPv6 and wished you had done something
>>differently during the planning phase that may have prevented headaches
>>down the road?
>
> I always tell people: you=E2=80=99re going to rewrite your address plan t=
hree
> times. Do what you can with it, then start deploying through the network.
> You=E2=80=99ll see what changes you need to make once you know how your n=
etwork is
> unique.
Also write your iACL/edge-filter before you deploy your IPv6. If you
can't write concise, almost static IPv6 iACL, your numbering plan
requires work.
--=20
++ytti
