[195265] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Jul 11 13:48:33 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:48:30 +0200
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <ce413858-25e9-68e4-a540-4fba11c4c1ca@shout.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* bryan@shout.net (Bryan Holloway) [Tue 11 Jul 2017, 19:28 CEST]:
>Also worth looking at your telemetries to see if it makes sense from
>an inbound/outbound point of view.
>
>That is, you'll get more bang for your buck if you're eyeballs and
>peering with a content provider (or vice versa), as opposed to
>eyeballs <-> eyeballs or content <-> content.
Luckily these are not exclusionary so you can peer with all networks
present at an Internet exchange with no repercussions.
-- Niels.
