[195263] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Holloway)
Tue Jul 11 13:28:14 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Bryan Holloway <bryan@shout.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:28:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0F9D2B02-C1AF-4F7B-975F-5B5DD8A946B5@ianai.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Also worth looking at your telemetries to see if it makes sense from an
inbound/outbound point of view.
That is, you'll get more bang for your buck if you're eyeballs and
peering with a content provider (or vice versa), as opposed to eyeballs
<-> eyeballs or content <-> content.
On 7/11/17 11:52 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> 1) Are they present an IX where I am present?
>
> 2) Can they configure BGP correctly?
>
> 3) … Beer?
>
> Private interconnect requires actual thinking. Putting a procedure in around public peering is just overhead we don’t need.
>
