[195201] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Mon Jul 3 20:26:20 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfZg+hJi3s3RCNSLeFy5NYGCHY3tA0bomeWm=utxQC7QnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:26:17 -0500
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
- Josh
On Jul 3, 2017 7:23 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <josh@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Specs...
>
>
> - MIPS64 16 Core 1.8 GHz
> - 16 GB DDR4 RAM
> - 8 MB NOR Flash 4 GB eMMC NAND Flash
> - Data Ports: (1) RJ45 Serial Port, (8) SFP+ Ports (1) RJ45 Gigabit
> Ethernet Port
> - 2 hotswap power supplies
>
>
> No LACP. ECMP is currently broken. MPLS/VPLS is currently broken and not
> done in hardware - this may eventually change. As far as the other stuff,
> "telemetry" etc - no.
>
> As far as BGP crunching, plenty of routes, etc - it would easily and
> happily be fine with that.
>
> As far as automation, it's a JunOS-like CLI originally based on vyatta,
> which AT&T now owns - and one of the main reasons is it's scriptability,
> use of Ansible and other tools right on the device, python, etc.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Jul 3, 2017 2:09 PM, "Job Snijders" <job@instituut.net> wrote:
>
>> Dear NANOG,
>>
>> Some friends of mine are operating a nonprofit (on shoe string) and
>> looking
>> to connect some CDN caches to an IX fabric. A BGP speaking device is
>> needed
>> between the caches and the BGP peers connected to the fabric. The BGP
>> speaker is needed to present the peers on the IX with a unified view of
>> the
>> assemblage of CDN nodes.
>>
>> I was wondering whether anyone was experience with the "EdgeRouter
>> Infinity
>> XG" device, specifically in the role of a simple peering router for a
>> couple of tens of thousands of routes. (I'd point default to the left and
>> take just the on-net routes on the right to reduce the table size
>> requirement).
>>
>> I hope the device can do at least 2xLACP trunks, has a sizable FIB, is
>> automatable (supports idempotency), can forward IMIX at line-rate, *flow,
>> and exposes some telemetry via SNMP.
>>
>> Any note sharing would be appreciated!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Job
>>
>
