[195219] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a9r=c3=b4me_Nicolle)
Fri Jul 7 05:10:07 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a9r=c3=b4me_Nicolle?= <jerome@ceriz.fr>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:10:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABNB40W+bBf+vPcMq--46RT1oC11Emj5B6R+Z+5u-nj4oha4Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hello Jeremy,
Le 04/07/2017 =C3=A0 01:10, Jeremy Austin a =C3=A9crit :
> can certainly handle a few tens of thousands of
> routes fine (single core BGP though),=20
It can take multiple full views. It's also faster than an MX104.
> but I can't vouch for its ability to
> do IMIX or *flow at line rate
I wouldn't load one to 80g, but at 10-20G, it creates no bottleneck.
The entire packet-pipeline is in software. IPFIX is not sampled, it's
1:1 only AFAIK. It's also lacking some features, meaning you'd need to
filter through pmacct to add BGP informations.
Best regards,
--=20
J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Nicolle
