|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org From: Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:38:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CAN9qwJ8v+tLV7FgSZ_OuqshpA11ohnAfetquA05fiE5L9Ojk3A@mail.gmail.com> To: Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org I think so And I said it a coulpe of times already Ge > Le 21 juin 2017 =C3=A0 15:25, Josh Luthman = <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > Does anyone else feel this thread has generated more spam in their = inbox > than the vendors? >=20 >=20 > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 >=20 > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net> wrote: >=20 >> On 6/13/17 10:28 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: >>=20 >>> But as I said, harvesting emails is not illegal under can spam. And = the >>> requirement to not send you UCE to harvested emails is pointless, = because >>> how do you prove that someone did that? >>>=20 >> Seed the list with one or two spamtrap addresses never seen in the = wild. >> Wait. >>=20 >> In this case, the spammer was stupid enough hot only to abuse a list = of >> technical people who run networks, but to brag about it within the = body of >> the spam. >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net >> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ >> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV >>=20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |