[195047] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ge Dupin)
Mon Jun 19 21:09:19 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr>
In-Reply-To: <E1dLssm-0005j7-0T@mail.scarynet.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 23:42:39 +0200
To: Alexander Maassen <outsider@scarynet.org>
Cc: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>, nanog@nanog.org, bzs@theworld.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
exactly
it is becoming really painful
Ge
> Le 16 juin 2017 =C3=A0 17:06, Alexander Maassen =
<outsider@scarynet.org> a =C3=A9crit :
>=20
> the discussion about the external spam kinda exceeds the volume of the =
spam itself. just my 2 cents.
> just block, delete, continue life
>=20
> Kind regards,
> Alexander Maassen
> - Technical Maintenance Engineer Parkstad Support BV- Maintainer =
DroneBL- Peplink Certified Engineer
>=20
> -------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------Van: bzs@theworld.com Datum: =
15-06-17 20:09 (GMT+01:00) Aan: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net> =
Cc: Niels Bakker <niels=3Dnanog@bakker.net>, nanog@nanog.org, =
bzs@theworld.com Onderwerp: Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees=20
>=20
> On June 14, 2017 at 14:22 goemon@sasami.anime.net (Dan Hollis) wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, bzs@theworld.com wrote:
>>> Merely deciding not to patronize them may not be sufficient and =
that's
>>> why we make that sort of thing just outright illegal rather than =
hope
>>> market forces will suffice.
>>=20
>> Most spam is sent from compromised machines anyway, so there are =
already=20
>> criminal violations involved in sending spam.
>=20
> FWIW I believe the context was a vendor spamming NANOG attendees (see
> the Subject:) so not likely being done from compromised machines.
>=20
> That said, yes, a lot of spam is sent from compromised machines as you
> say.
>=20
> But criminal violations can be additive, even rising to things like
> RICO charges (a pattern of organized criminal behavior etc.) which can
> be both criminal and civil and added onto charges like the criminality
> of specific mechanisms (compromised systems etc.)
>=20
> It really depends on how interested one can get the legal machinery in
> the problem. Thus far that's hit or miss. I can't find any instance
> where RICO charges were used against a spam gang tho, at least on a
> quick search.
>=20
> --=20
> -Barry Shein
>=20
> Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | =
http://www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
> The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*