[195008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alain Hebert)
Mon Jun 19 09:36:31 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert@pubnix.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:36:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <e750dd0c-c176-d6a5-f965-19463c146e65@lists.esoteric.ca>
Reply-To: ahebert@pubnix.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi,
Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT...
And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range.
But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency
alone cannot be the factor.
( And Gordy... what?!? )
-----
Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 06/16/17 19:42, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> Alain,
>
> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or
> are these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through
> "normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
>
> -- Stephen
>
> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the
>> target goes through normal peering than through an exchanges google
>> exists in?
>>
>> We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can
>> upload up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets
>> say TorIX, but cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of
>> them) sittings on our peering links.
>>
>> PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps )
>> between each others and others test points we have;
>>
>> PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
>>
>> PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
>>
>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps. Its my only
>> test point with a TorIX access
>>
>
