[195003] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Sun Jun 18 17:45:13 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>
In-Reply-To: <304AB7E9-7AA9-40CC-BCF5-DFAAC9A9C62E@cookreport.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:45:09 -0400
To: Stephen Fulton <sf@lists.esoteric.ca>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
please accept my apologies this response was totally out of context
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell
>=20
> but with valerie home any minute i must stop
>=20
> will come back though
>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Stephen Fulton <sf@lists.esoteric.ca> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> Alain,
>>=20
>> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or =
are these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through =
"normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
>>=20
>> -- Stephen
>>=20
>> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the =
target goes through normal peering than through an exchanges google =
exists in?
>>> We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can =
upload up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets say =
TorIX, but cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of them) =
sittings on our peering links.
>>> PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps ) =
between each others and others test points we have;
>>> PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
>>> PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
>>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps. Its my only =
test point with a TorIX access
>>=20
>=20
>=20
