[194572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier classification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Hoppes)
Sat May 13 11:55:53 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matt Hoppes <mattlists@rivervalleyinternet.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSzWsB2dYyhrH9THoxMP=A_TcWVYvWYFCVkHS2LxTz0Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 11:55:14 -0400
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
So there are now Carrier Class carriers and Food Grade Carriers?
Who in the greater community defines terms like this?
> On May 13, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes <mattlists@rivervalleyinterne=
t.net> wrote:
>> Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carrier=
s?
>=20
> Yes, pretty much dead.=20
>=20
> There are networks that meet your price / performance, and those that don'=
t.=20
