[194571] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier classification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Sat May 13 11:52:52 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <07F5F811-BEBF-4F85-9A48-877CE676D05C@rivervalleyinternet.net>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 15:52:38 +0000
To: Matt Hoppes <mattlists@rivervalleyinternet.net>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes <
mattlists@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carriers?
>
Yes, pretty much dead.
There are networks that meet your price / performance, and those that
don't.
