[194341] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CGNAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pshem Kowalczyk)
Fri Apr 7 21:04:24 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704072002540.27978@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Pshem Kowalczyk <pshem.k@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 01:04:10 +0000
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I can confirm that percentage (at least with residential customer base).
All big content providers and a number of CDNs will do IPv6 by default. One
thing that will heavily affect this is the CPE equipment (which might not
have IPv6 enabled or even be capable of it).
kind regards
Pshem
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 at 06:19 Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> > BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
> > load of CGNAT?
>
> Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual
> stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>
