[194348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CGNAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tassos Chatzithomaoglou)
Mon Apr 10 08:20:34 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnet.gr>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:20:35 +0300
In-Reply-To: <1491819092.1272244.939792200.718098E5@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
With a ~59% dual-stack percentage and a 8% ds-lite percentage (aka 67%
of our subscriber base has IPv6), we get around 40% of IPv6 traffic.
--
Tassos
Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote on 10/4/2017 1:11 =CE=BC=CE=BC:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 20:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actu=
al
>>> load of CGNAT?
>> Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual=20
>> stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.
> My data on customers supposed to be 100% dual-stack (unless they
> explicitely disable IPv6 on their side, which some of them do) says 25%
> on best days. It used to be up to 35% in late 2015.
> For reason unknown, it was going slightly down during 2016, with a
> sudden extra decrease in january this year.
>
