[194331] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CGNAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shahab Vahabzadeh)
Thu Apr 6 11:56:54 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: Shahab Vahabzadeh <sh.vahabzadeh@gmail.com>
To: Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>
In-Reply-To: <49162897-2AF1-4063-A381-C7A4572ABC28@hrins.net>
Cc: "Nanog@Nanog" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hello Ahmad,I am using F5 for CGNAT, right now 250K subscriber with 28Gbps bandwidth, I will double it with the second appliance easily soon.Its high performance and I like it.Any time Any QuestionThanks
Ch,
Shahab
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:41 PM +0430, "Ahmed Munaf" <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net> wrote:
Hi,
Any recommendation regarding CGNAT appliance who try it and which brand is the best from his perspective!
The throughput which I want to pass through the CGNAT is about 40Gbits and number of subscribers are about 40,000 subscribers.
Regards,
Ahmed
