|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7DUaHUGqG=CPw2JyDAstt1eNPGSYZq0PK9dOnQ3wC4PYQ@mail.gmail.com> From: Jeff Waddell <jeff+nanog@waddellsolutions.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:36:23 -0500 To: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org Ah - you are correct So - yeah what Alarig said - get full routes from all On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> wrote: > That will have the effect of prioritizing Cogent routes as that would be > more specific than the default routes from the other providers. Cogent ar= e > not that good that you would want to do that. > > Den 2. mar. 2017 20.16 skrev "Jeff Waddell" <jeff+nanog@waddellsolutions. > com > >: > > Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any rout= es > they don't have > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> > wrote: > > > On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote: > > > Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 defaul= t > > > route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them... > > > > Why did you don=E2=80=99t ask for a full view? With that, you can easil= y deal > > with that kind of problem. > > > > -- > > alarig > > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |