[193927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Baldur Norddahl)
Thu Mar 2 14:31:41 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7DN0VOZ4C3BaozEgeBKR2SZcRxW+Ob0yET3bZdH298Aew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 20:30:37 +0100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That will have the effect of prioritizing Cogent routes as that would be
more specific than the default routes from the other providers. Cogent are
not that good that you would want to do that.
Den 2. mar. 2017 20.16 skrev "Jeff Waddell" <jeff+nanog@waddellsolutions.co=
m
>:
Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes
they don't have
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> wrote:
> On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote:
> > Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default
> > route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them...
>
> Why did you don=E2=80=99t ask for a full view? With that, you can easily =
deal
> with that kind of problem.
>
> --
> alarig
>
