[19318] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: European/Asian equivalents to NANOG?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Sat Sep 5 22:29:16 1998
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: chris@connect.com.au (Chris Chaundy)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 12:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hcb@clark.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.980906114339.1528C-100000@anakie.off.connect.com.au> from "Chris Chaundy" at Sep 6, 98 11:47:01 am
>
> On Sat, 5 Sep 1998 bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
> > Note that having world-wide input into NANOG kind of defeats its purpose.
>
> Bill,
>
> It would really make sense to have a heirarchy of ops lists, as there are
> events/issues that have world-wide significance, and those that are more
> regional in nature. It is the lack of these that results in the 'misuse'
> of NANOG (plus the fact that most routes still transit the USA :-|).
> --
Well, it sort of exists already.
zanog - (south)Africa
nanog - North America
eof - European
apops - Asia/Pacific
Leaving out South America (onlybecauseIdon'tknow)
The iepg list covers global coordination, at least from it's CCIRN
roots.
YMMV.
--bill
