[19316] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: European/Asian equivalents to NANOG?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Chaundy)
Sat Sep 5 22:00:03 1998
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 11:47:01 +1000 (EST)
From: Chris Chaundy <chris@connect.com.au>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
cc: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199809051719.KAA02090@vacation.karoshi.com>
On Sat, 5 Sep 1998 bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> Note that having world-wide input into NANOG kind of defeats its purpose.
Bill,
It would really make sense to have a heirarchy of ops lists, as there are
events/issues that have world-wide significance, and those that are more
regional in nature. It is the lack of these that results in the 'misuse'
of NANOG (plus the fact that most routes still transit the USA :-|).
--
Chris Chaundy (Core Engineering Manager)
connect.com.au pty ltd, Level 9, 114 Albert Rd, Sth Melbourne, VIC 3205, Aust.
Internet: chris@connect.com.au Phone: +61 3 9251-3671 Fax: +61 3 9251-3666
