[192404] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bzs@TheWorld.com)
Thu Oct 27 15:39:32 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:39:07 -0400
From: bzs@TheWorld.com
To: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A47CD3B-612F-474A-B810-70ADF0DFCB0D@blighty.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


FWIW abuse@whatever seems to be a favorite in many spammers' lists.

I doubt that's their intent, seems like a good way to draw attention
to the spam from people with access to blocking lists etc, so I'll
guess they just blindly harvest web sites etc and abuse@whatever shows
up frequently.

That certainly doesn't help with the volume, some of that slips thru
spam filters, it adds up.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post