[192404] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bzs@TheWorld.com)
Thu Oct 27 15:39:32 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:39:07 -0400
From: bzs@TheWorld.com
To: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A47CD3B-612F-474A-B810-70ADF0DFCB0D@blighty.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
FWIW abuse@whatever seems to be a favorite in many spammers' lists.
I doubt that's their intent, seems like a good way to draw attention
to the spam from people with access to blocking lists etc, so I'll
guess they just blindly harvest web sites etc and abuse@whatever shows
up frequently.
That certainly doesn't help with the volume, some of that slips thru
spam filters, it adds up.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*