[192399] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Thu Oct 27 14:40:35 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
To: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A47CD3B-612F-474A-B810-70ADF0DFCB0D@blighty.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Steve Atkins wrote:
> If mail to abuse@ doesn't bounce, give them the benefit
> of the doubt until statistics say otherwise.

I give them a couple weeks/months. The vast majority of them ignore, and 
allow the abuse to continue.

It's amazing how quickly they respond when they get SBL'd though! 
Lightning quick.

-Dan

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post