[191814] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Sep 27 14:01:44 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:01:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
In-Reply-To: <CAAAas8HoX7urMKN-9_TjJNqLDDeY_XTLQAgi0vxaU9wc3eFcYA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Mike Jones wrote:

> Any network operator should know if their network is blocking it or not 
> without having to deploy active probes across their network.

Err... I was not referring to the operator doing this on the CPEs they 
provide to their customers. I was referring to enthusiast customers who 
are running their own CPEs to test if their ISPs are doing anti-spoofing 
properly or not, and report this information to someone centrally.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post