[191812] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Jones)
Tue Sep 27 13:41:10 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609271630340.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:40:26 +0100
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 27 September 2016 at 15:32, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Joe Klein wrote:
>
>> What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS?
>
>
> Well, you can get people to run
> https://www.caida.org/projects/spoofer/#software
>
> I tried to get OpenWrt to include similar software, on by default, but some
> people are afraid that they might incur legal action on themselves by doing
> antispoofing-testing.
Any network operator should know if their network is blocking it or
not without having to deploy active probes across their network.
If a network is thinking about it enough to want to block it, they
will probably do so by turning knobs on their routers rather than
deploying another patch to the CPE.
I don't think the CPE is the solution here.
- Mike Jones
