[190918] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Barak via NANOG)
Tue Aug 2 23:28:14 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGS7ZoOSdZDNVzyrqgVJiKcr-hKyVVqyKpv2Dop4pFtWig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:28:10 -0700
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: David Barak via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Simpler > complex *sometimes*. It turns out that sometimes the complexity i=
s worth it (eg https://youtu.be/-iiXsbrEv3U ). Perhaps "as simple as possib=
le, by no simpler" would be reasonable?
David Barak
Sent from mobile device, please excuse autocorrection artifacts
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote
> CB
>=20
> Ps. Also, simpler > complex. Lots of $ in this statement.
