[190039] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Tue Jun 14 11:50:27 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:50:24 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFN0R26s22kpK_97WtKBbG-iNUkzpn2pZ24kWMsJih=+-WSKQg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue 2016-Jun-14 10:12:10 -0500, Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org> wrote:
>This week at NANOG67, a presentation was given early on that did not
>reflect well for our community at large. Regardless of the content or
>accuracy of the data presented (not the intention of this thread), specific
>members of the community (some of which are sponsors) were clearly targeted
>in a hurtful manner. The delivery of the content did not seem within the
>spirit of NANOG, but instead a personal opinion piece. While no specific
>rules of the speaking guidelines
><https://www.nanog.org/meetings/presentation/guidelines> were likely
>broken, this does bring up a point of where the acceptable threshold exists
>(if at all). To be abundantly clear - I have nothing against the content
>itself, the presenter, the PC's choice of allowing this talk, etc. - I only
>wish to clarify if our guidelines need modernization.
>
>As a community, how do we provide constructive criticism to industry
>suppliers (that may also be fellow competitors, members, and/or suppliers)?
>For example, router vendors are routinely compared without specific names
>mentioned (say in the case of a unpublished vulnerability) - how is a
>service provider any different?
I understand the discretion involved in your question, but could we clarify=
=20
exactly what presentation is being discussed so those of us who were not=20
present at NANOG67 can also participate in an informed way?
>--Matt
--=20
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
--WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=5NFh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd--
