[189965] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Enough about Netflix banning HE tunnels [really: IPv6 adoption]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jun 10 16:29:20 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "STARNES, CURTIS" <Curtis.Starnes@granburyisd.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR0801MB677900EA028B51ECF8820F89E500@CO2PR0801MB677.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:21:43 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, "bzs@TheWorld.com" <bzs@TheWorld.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1465590103_2073P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:12:43 -0000, "STARNES, CURTIS" said:
> and the Chromebook content filtering is not IPv6 compatible either
So what are you using for content filtering? A quick google search
indicates that there do exist filtering solutions that are IPv6
capable?
And what *non* Chromebook solution are you using that's IPv6
capable on the *other* boxes?
(Which still doesn't change the fact that you just purchased 5K units
of something that runs Linux under the hood).
--==_Exmh_1465590103_2073P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=hqWa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1465590103_2073P--
