[189798] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Monitoring system recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Tue Jun 7 01:13:25 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD0TWZ8i-Y9cqWZ9irM15BH2QrMRpBAhFOe39D5eFPhhpy3NSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 01:11:30 -0400
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Manuel_Mar=C3=ADn?= <mmg@transtelco.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I once worked for Zenoss and still suggest them. Zenoss supports NAGIOS
plugins, and my $DAYJOB is at a Zenoss Partner who can help you achieve
your goals. If you need some help with Zenoss feel free to contact me off
list.
Andrew
On Monday, June 6, 2016, Manuel Mar=C3=ADn <mmg@transtelco.net> wrote:
> Dear Nanog community
>
> We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due =
to
> scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for monitori=
ng
> 5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring system
> that is compatible with the nagios plugin format, however we are not sure
> if systems like Icinga/Shinken/Op5 are the way to go.
>
> Is someone using systems like Op5 or Icinga2 for monitoring > 5000 hosts?
> Would you recommend commercial systems like Sevone, Zabbix, etc instead o=
f
> open source ones?
>
> Your input is really appreciated it
>
> Thank you and have a great day
>
> Regards
>
