[189816] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Monitoring system recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Tue Jun 7 08:49:36 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 07:49:27 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD0TWZ8i-Y9cqWZ9irM15BH2QrMRpBAhFOe39D5eFPhhpy3NSw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I'm not at that scale, but I've seen some fairly impressive performance sea=
rching through a friend's NetXMS system with a couple years of verbose sysl=
og and monitoring to go through.=20
-----=20
Mike Hammett=20
Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
http://www.ics-il.com=20
Midwest Internet Exchange=20
http://www.midwest-ix.com=20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manuel Mar=C3=ADn" <mmg@transtelco.net>=20
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>=20
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 9:18:07 AM=20
Subject: Monitoring system recommendation=20
Dear Nanog community=20
We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due to=
=20
scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for monitoring=
=20
5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring system=20
that is compatible with the nagios plugin format, however we are not sure=
=20
if systems like Icinga/Shinken/Op5 are the way to go.=20
Is someone using systems like Op5 or Icinga2 for monitoring > 5000 hosts?=
=20
Would you recommend commercial systems like Sevone, Zabbix, etc instead of=
=20
open source ones?=20
Your input is really appreciated it=20
Thank you and have a great day=20
Regards=20
