[189594] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eygene Ryabinkin)
Fri Jun 3 01:05:50 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:05:44 +0300
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea+nanog@grid.kiae.ru>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k1EJ_5R=_OBbRvQQeBxCtQ2kno62a-jozNWzyhm-3jjEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Rubens, good day.
Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:32:29PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html
> >
> > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> > over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
> > studies from Linkedin and Facebook.
> >
>
> Says the company that consistently refused to dual-stack its customers by
> default...
What's your point? Does their technical reasoning or proving grounds
for it lacking the needed expertise/experience due to the problems
you're describing? Any other thigs you can say about the actual study?
--
Eygene Ryabinkin, National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be
a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
