[189593] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Thu Jun 2 23:35:34 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:33:22 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20160602180554.GA18851@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu 2016-Jun-02 11:05:54 -0700, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
>Warning: Hat =3D Enterprise Network Admin
> Sarcasm =3D High
> ...
>
>Sadly, I wish all these answers were some sort of carachture of reality,
>but I think they are too many folks reality.
IOW:
http://ipv6excuses.com/ / https://twitter.com/ipv6excuses
--=20
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
--4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=2YXS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4zI0WCX1RcnW9Hbu--
