[189571] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Thu Jun 2 13:18:08 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:17:59 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZBa2eWb3DTnA98rOCtir45ptysyVWCENceahJ8rJSfgw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yes.=20
-----=20
Mike Hammett=20
Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
http://www.ics-il.com=20
Midwest-IX=20
http://www.midwest-ix.com=20
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>=20
To: "Daniel Corbe" <dcorbe@hammerfiber.com>=20
Cc: nanog@nanog.org=20
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 11:41:33 AM=20
Subject: Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4=20
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe <dcorbe@hammerfiber.com>=20
wrote:=20
> Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if=
=20
> objectively that isn=E2=80=99t true. Perhaps that will help speed along t=
he=20
> adoption process.=20
do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6=20
deployment on the slow-boat?=20
