[189565] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Thu Jun 2 12:14:00 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAN9qwJ-v5CDkC2++Kbya4WNLp27wpd=rkN=-j76o29LZfs2=iA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:13:56 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Josh Luthman <josh@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote=
:
> Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M DS=
L
> out in the sticks. That weighs the average connection time down. v6 bei=
ng
> capable on modern 4G wireless and fiber connections makes the average
> faster.
>
>
>
Akamai, linkedin, and facebook are not lightweights when it comes to data
analysis. Meaning, they know about selection basis. I'll also mention
that google has v6 as well.
FTFA, Akamai states they isolated dual-stack iphones on vzw and ran
parallel RUM v4 and v6 tests. I believe FB did the same thing and
presented the data at nanog 64
CB
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow <
> morrowc.lists@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','morrowc.lists@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cb.list6@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks=
-why-and-how.html
>> >
>> > Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
>> > over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference corroborating
>> > studies from Linkedin and Facebook.
>> >
>> > Fair to ask your business 1) does mobile performance matter 2) are you
>> > taking advantage of this 10% page load speedup that ipv6 provides?
>> >
>>
>> =E2=80=8Bsrs question: "What percentage of the mobile world prefers v6 o=
ver v4?"
>>
>> I ask because perhaps the market for your app is such that v6 is actuall=
y
>> a
>> hinderance to the userbase... (or is slower in your market)
>>
>> Are there more holistic studies about this?=E2=80=8B
>>
>
>
