[189457] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS Reference Designs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri May 27 17:53:08 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: ahebert@pubnix.net, nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:52:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <096e8320-1f6a-7e47-0f2a-3e4811b692f1@pubnix.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 27/May/16 20:36, Alain Hebert wrote:
>
> ( Obviously interoperability is just ridiculous when talking MPLS... )
Why would you think so?
>
> Too many times we ended up finding boxes that look the part but are
> limited in such a way to accomplish only the task that fit the vendor
> own MPLS paradigm.
> ( TLDR: Make us spend more $$$ than needed =D long gone is the
> swiss-knife concept )
What platforms have you worked on before that have caused you grief?
Mark.
