[189456] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri May 27 17:49:55 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mohamed Kamal <mkamal@noor.net>,
Timothy Creswick <Timothy.Creswick@vorboss.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:49:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <659655545.1317035.1464356802091.JavaMail.zimbra@noor.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 27/May/16 15:46, Mohamed Kamal wrote:
> tried this Timothy, and the RSVP didn't appear in the inet.3. Failed to work!
Best option is to create a separate Loopback interface on each router,
and use that to signal the RSVP tunnels.
It's the only way to keep your LDP and RSVP tunnels from mingling with
each other for EoMPLS circuits you want to nail on a given path.
Mark.
