[188359] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: CALEA Requirements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Burke)
Fri Mar 18 16:19:50 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Kevin Burke <kburke@burlingtontelecom.com>
To: Lorell Hathcock <lorell@hathcock.org>, 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:19:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <031701d17e32$aa36d5c0$fea48140$@hathcock.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Ignore it until you get the paperwork. The local law enforcement can not g=
et a warrant for the real time, full data capture. Only FBI or other natio=
nal agencies can get those subpeona's. We went through this with our local=
police department. They wanted to make sure we were prepared and wanted a=
test for the real time number capture on phone calls. They didn't mention=
they don't have any equipment on their side to connect the T1. =20
Ask your local neighbors. Some area's have a number of local federal inves=
tigations. If you get the deer in the headlights look from your competitio=
n then you may never get one of these.
The full data captures are rare.
Kevin Burke
802-540-0979
Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington
200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 4:47 PM
To: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: CALEA Requirements
NANOG:
=20
Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements?
=20
As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my router=
s? Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court order?
=20
I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am complia=
nt going forward in my capabilities.
=20
Thanks!
=20
Lorell Hathcock