[188359] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: CALEA Requirements

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Burke)
Fri Mar 18 16:19:50 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Kevin Burke <kburke@burlingtontelecom.com>
To: Lorell Hathcock <lorell@hathcock.org>, 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:19:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <031701d17e32$aa36d5c0$fea48140$@hathcock.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Ignore it until you get the paperwork.  The local law enforcement can not g=
et a warrant for the real time, full data capture.  Only FBI or other natio=
nal agencies can get those subpeona's.  We went through this with our local=
 police department.  They wanted to make sure we were prepared and wanted a=
 test for the real time number capture on phone calls.  They didn't mention=
 they don't have any equipment on their side to connect the T1. =20

Ask your local neighbors.  Some area's have a number of local federal inves=
tigations.  If you get the deer in the headlights look from your competitio=
n then you may never get one of these.

The full data captures are rare.

Kevin Burke
802-540-0979
Burlington Telecom - City of Burlington
200 Church St, Burlington, VT 05401

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 4:47 PM
To: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: CALEA Requirements

NANOG:

=20

Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements?

=20

As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my router=
s?  Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court order?

=20

I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am complia=
nt going forward in my capabilities.

=20

Thanks!

=20

Lorell Hathcock


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post