[187669] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu Feb 18 10:55:03 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <56C5E869.7030406@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:55:00 -0500
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>=20
> In other words, "hitless" does not mean "not service impacting".
I would assume any SMU impacts traffic and requires a reboot or a line =
card reset. There are types of SMUs that touch low level parts and =
require a reboot, in which case I=E2=80=99ve often told Cisco they =
should just rev the release number.
Solving SMU dependencies is sometimes impossible. Right now the 5.3.3 =
SMU set posted on CCO can=E2=80=99t be installed with any of their =
automation/tools. We are waiting for Cisco to provide a fix. I=E2=80=99m=
not holding my breath.
- Jared=
