[187600] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: PCH Peering Paper

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Fri Feb 12 20:56:18 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:56:14 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <56be7b64.c7d20d0a.2857.0327@mx.google.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

* bedard.phil@gmail.com (Phil Bedard) [Sat 13 Feb 2016, 01:40 CET]:
>I was going to ask the same thing, since even for settlement free 
>peering between large content providers and eyeball networks there 
>are written agreements in place.  I would have no clue on the volume 
>percentage but it's not going to be near 99%.

It's much closer to 99% than to 50%, though.


	-- Niels.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post