[187570] in North American Network Operators' Group
PCH Peering Paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Wed Feb 10 18:34:38 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:34:33 -0500
To: North American Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules, =
talking about myself.)
The paper is:
=
https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-201=
1.pdf
I said =E2=80=9C99.97%=E2=80=9D of all peering sessions have nothing =
behind them more than a =E2=80=9Chandshake=E2=80=9D or an email. It =
seems I was in error. Mea Culpa.
The number in the paper, on page one is, 99.52%.
Hopefully everyone will read the paper, and perhaps help create better =
data.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
